By the 1850’s, scientists began to realize that the atom was made up of subatomic particles
Thought to be positive and negative
1897, English scientist J.J. Thomson provided the first hint that an atom is made of even smaller particles
Thompson understood that all matter was inherently neutral, so there must be a counter


Rutherford and the nucleus slide:
Nucleus:
Electron Cloud:
The evolution of atomic theories, from Dalton to quantum mechanics, exemplifies the scientific process: experimentation, hypothesis formation, and rigorous testing. Chemists collaborate, combining empirical evidence with theoretical concepts to understand matter. Experimentalists work at the observable level, while theorists explore unseen particles and forces. Their synergy may lead to Nobel Prize-worthy breakthroughs, fostering pride at personal and national levels.
J. J. Thomson’s quantitative experiments with cathode rays resulted in the discovery of the electron, whose charge was later measured by Robert Millikan. The Thomson model of the atom (1897) was a hypothesis that the atom was composed of electrons (negative particles) embedded in a positively charged sphere. Thomson’s research group at Cambridge University in England used mathematics to predict the uniform three-dimensional distribution of the electrons throughout the atom. The Thomson model of the atom is often communicated by using the analogy of a raisin bun, with the raisins depicting the electrons and the bun being the positive material of his atom
Ernest Rutherford, eventually showed that some parts of the Thomson atomic theory were not correct. Rutherford developed an expertise with nuclear radiation during the nine years he spent at McGill University in Montreal.
Rutherford’s nuclear model of the atom was then created to explain the evidence gathered in this scattering experiment. Rutherford’s analysis showed that all of the positive charge in the atom had to be in a very small volume compared to the size of the atom. Only then could he explain the results of the experiment
Even though these theoretical ideas seemed far-fetched, they explained the experimental evidence. Rutherford’s explanation of the evidence gradually gained widespread acceptance in the scientific community